1
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,902 Given: 1,363 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,902 Given: 1,363 |
Guys, I just found a way to make it work. I got a result now. Hurray!
Very boring and common result but at least I know it now
Thumbs Up |
Received: 401 Given: 632 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,902 Given: 1,363 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 401 Given: 632 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,902 Given: 1,363 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 401 Given: 632 |
Based on what I know about Y DNA, and assuming this works the same for mtDNA, I guess they don't have some of the subbranches in their database on phylotree. Another option is that your branch has mutations not registered in your raw data so you need deeper test
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,488 Given: 6,858 |
Target: rothaer_scaled
Distance: 1.0091% / 0.01009085
39.8 (Balto-)Slavic
39.0 Germanic
19.2 Celtic-like
1.8 Graeco-Roman
0.2 Finnic-like
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,902 Given: 1,363 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 401 Given: 632 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks