Ask rothaer anything

[rothaer]

You seem to be a biological determinist. As am I to a great degree. What would you say are the moral characteristics of a predominantly Southern European mixed with East Eurasian like myself to be like? And do I fit the mold?

A thoughtful question.

I even do extend the biological determination to lingusitic expression. But: First, as for my opinion it has to be taken into account whether it's about a population level or an individual level. If you have an Nigerian speaking English he will speak perfectly Oxford English if you socialise him as a singleton. But if he will be among his own kind in in hundreds of thousands in an English speaking environment it will turn out like African Americans speak. There are biological tendencies that just break through if they get the "majority" or more correct: a sufficient proportion.

You as a singleton would likely much adapt to your environment like all humans do. Another interesting question would be: How would a population that is put on it's own that is 3/4 Italian and 1/4 East Asian be? We could here just speculate, based on the known characteristics of the parent ancestries.

At a first glance you would assume a weighted average as a result and in many cases this is true. But not always. If you f. i. mix copper and tin you get bronze that is much harder than both "parent" metals. In the same way also human mixtures are not always simply forming an intermediate state. IMO the German people is an example for that. Germans are more strict, unrelaxed and determined than all of their neighbours in spite of being able to be modelled as a mixture of them.

As for your question I think that East Asian seriosity could compensate a lot of Mediterranean "laissez-fair" but I really have no clue what would be the outcome if you had a a separate population with that ancestry figures.

[CosmoLady]

A Reichsbürger considers the German Empire legit and de jure existent and the FRG illegal. To be perfectly correct this question is not a matter of fact but a matter of opinion and I consider this opinion to be legally motivated with more ease than the opposite (mainstream) opinion. Whether this opinion comes to force by enough people following it or not is another story. I think that the FRG once in the future will dissolve itself by a parliament decision and revive the German Empire because you by that move can get rid of a lot of huge FRG problems, forced treaties, the citizens that comprise all the naturalised non-Germans etc.
However, a Reichsbürger is not promoting a separation. To a Reichsbürger not just himself is a Reichsbürger but all that do have the German Empire citizenship and that are most Germans. They don't "separate" more from "society" than anyone else with a conflicting with the mainstream determined opinion.

I know that Reichsburgers are not promoting secession.
But supposedly they increasingly separate themselves from society, like Orthodox Jews or Mennonites.
Besides their monarchist beliefs, they tend to live together in rural areas (mostly in East Germany I think),
they are against vaccination, the medical system, the education system, many other things...
This is what I have read in mainstream American/British media, maybe this is wrong.

The Reichsburgers are forming a tribe I think, and they will be perceived as different from everyone else,
IF Germany (and mainstream modern white Germans) continue changing beyond recognition.

IF the German state becomes more repressive and hostile to its declining native population,
then more native Germans will separate themselves from society,
and become Reichsburgers or other socially separatist tribes.

What do you think of the Reichsburgers aside from their monarchist beliefs?
What do you think about their other beliefs and lifestyle and coherence?

Can they form the foundation of a future ethnic-social-political tribe of Germans?