0
I mean, if something is false, the worst thing you can do to it, is to show its falseness.
Saying that it is politically incorrect can’t make it more dismissible than its falsity itself.
If, on the other hand, something is not false, than it should not be censured.
It might not be very wise to say it all-the-time/in-the-face-of-anyone, but at the very least it should be on the table, and maybe time after time we might want to remind ourselves why it is not very wise to use it more frequently.
I think we don’t really need such a general-purpose term/policy which can (and has) be hijacked to be applied at arbitrary things.
What do you think about this?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Confession:
Yesterday, when a new user in her message implied about the non-political-correctness (of some content) of this forum (in a good sense, however), I became aware that not only I was not aware about it, but I don’t really have such a thing as a politically-correctness-sensor incorporated in me.
So, following the wisdom that “safety is numbers”, I thought I better try to convert as much as I can in my religion, than being attacked time after time as being politically incorrect.
Bookmarks