Classify this romanian

[Dacul]

http://www.plosone.org/article/info%...one.0041803#s5
So they found in moldovans N-P43 and Q-M242,which are asian,but very few.

[Zmey Gorynych]

Yes good analysis, Romanians are in general not different from other Balkan populations. They are not exotic in any sense.
Good you point out the Serbian tennisplayers. Ofc I know also from observing the Serb diaspora here that they have quite an Central Asian component too.
The Slovaks too according to my experience

My intention was not to expose (or present in a bad light) the serbs or bulgarians but aherne who certainly has an agenda. Turanids are present among all balkanite nations but they are isolated cases (here and there) and in no way representative of the nations in question.

[Dacul]

Aherne has an agenda?
Lol Zmey you do not see that the poor guy have some missing screws?

[Dasr]

you dont find my father turanid? this romanian guy is turanid but not my hungarian father?

[Corvus]

My intention was not to expose (or present in a bad light) the serbs or bulgarians but aherne who certainly has an agenda. Turanids are present among all balkanite nations but they are isolated cases (here and there) and in no way representative of the nations in question.

No but it is reality that these types exist in Eastern Europe. Huns and Avars or later Turks have left a genetic trace. Ofc they are far from beeing the standard type, but a visible minority. We should never deny that.

[Dacul]

you dont find my father turanid? this romanian guy is turanid but not my hungarian father?

Lol see what Pallantides posted,hungarian have less than 1% ancestry,in autosomal tests,that could be cumans,pechenegs,huns,tatars etc.
They got about 37.5% NW european admixture (which is scando/celtic at origin,highest percentages being in Norway and Ireland) 25% or so NE european admixture (which peaks in Poland,Estonia,Finland etc) and about 25% med admixture.Few west asian also.

[blabla]

Never been to Romania, but from my observation Romanians are quite diverse people. In Banat they tend to look very slavic, typicaly eastern european, while Vlachs from eastern Serbia look almost completly Latin.
The few ones i meet in W. Europe looked "normal", nothing turanid about them.

[aherne]

Aherne has a distorted view of reality, he always goes out his way to portray romanians as being different(exotic) from other ethnic groups (especially from former yugoslavs). He also shows a great deal of inconsistency in his posting, alternating opinions more often than I socks.
How can one say that only hungarians and romanians have turanid individuals when two of the most famous serb female tennis players are turanid. As for bulgarians not having turanid, well that certainly cracked me up.
It is quite obvious that his persistence in posting romanian turanid individuals is dictated by his own peculiar appearance and can only be interpreted as an attempt to explain and why not legitimate that appearance.

One defining characteristic of idiotic people is their vacuous arrogance. They don't know shit about anything, yet they use insults or signs such as this as a way to demonstrate their "point" (which is achieved not by proving any "point" but by means of discrediting "competitor"). Same way as Jews or their brain-dead followers use the word "Nazi" as a way to "discredit" you (and making you a villain) for telling the truth.

Another important aspect of idiotic people is their limited sight in things: they are oblivious of nuances thus have to reduce everything to black-white. Look for example at this thread subject and how this idiot reacts. I only pointed out a Romanian Turanid and stated these individuals occur MUCH MORE in Romanians than in Bulgarians or Serbs (not that latter completely lack it). Much more is a relative term: 5% is MUCH MORE than 1%.

Another thing others may notice is how idiotic people make unchecked extrapolations while never even thinking about seeing the great picture. Two Turanid Serbian tennis players (who?) prove nothing except that Turanid exists in Serbs also, but say nothing about how common they are.

I could go further but see no point. For those able to listen:
The territory of modern Romania, found at the termination of Eurasian steppe, was invaded by Turkic tribes wave after wave throughout a thousand years (from Avars to Tatars), whereas South of Danube, where Byzantines then Slavs ruled, influence remained minimal (Bulgar interlude left very little impact in language or appearance) compared to north of Danube: nearly all of Turkic place-names South of Danube are of much more recent Turkish origin, whereas North of Danube they are quite frequent, especially in lowlands. In the earliest historical testimonies of Romanians, one sees an alternation of Slavo-Romanian and Turkic personal names, testimonies of a mixture under way.

Finally, I'll add you to my ignore list, because you have nothing interesting to say.

[aherne]

this romanian guy is turanid but not my hungarian father?

No he's not! What kind of argument is that? You have no logic either...

[Zmey Gorynych]

One defining characteristic of idiotic people is their vacuous arrogance. They don't know shit about anything, yet they use insults or signs such as this as a way to demonstrate their "point" (which is achieved not by proving any "point" but by means of discrediting "competitor"). Same way as Jews or their brain-dead followers use the word "Nazi" as a way to "discredit" you (and making you a villain) for telling the truth.

My intention was not to deny the turanid influence in romanians but prove that your persistence in bringing this up was dictated by your own appearance in a pathetic attempt to justify it. The fact that you have not denied this and your turkic/steppe reaction makes me think that I was right. I do not understand why do you complain about insults when I have not insulted you, only mentioned the fact that you have an obvious asian influenced appearance and a slight detachment from reality. It certainly doesn't match your rant directed at me.

I only pointed out a Romanian Turanid and stated these individuals occur MUCH MORE in Romanians than in Bulgarians or Serbs (not that latter completely lack it). Much more is a relative term: 5% is MUCH MORE than 1%.

Why don't you check what you actually wrote Jackie Chan !? You said and I quote:" For better and worse the frontier was kept and this explains why Romanians have it and Bulgarians do not" unquote.