0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,687 Given: 1,192 |
You bring up a fair point. I've been both to your country and Tajikistan and can honestly say say Kazakh and Tajik phenotypes are not exactly the same. While there was indeed a paper that showed mongoloid admixture among the people of Tajikistan it should be noted that admixture is not uniform among all sub-ethnic groups within that country. Some Tajiks in the more remote isolated regions like Yagnobi people don't even look all that mongoloid or even Turanid. In Dushanbe, most people's phenotypes showed a prevailing blend of west and south Asian. Granted they may have autosomal traits that show mongoloid admixture but average Tajik does not look like average Kazakh.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,332 Given: 1,058 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 498 Given: 214 |
Sorry but based on the pictures of Uzbeks what I've seen many of them have visible Mongoloid features or look even predominantly Mongoloid. The Uzbeks from Afghanistan look more Mongoloid admixed than the Uzbeks from Uzbekistan
http://userserve-ak.last.fm/serve/_/...rkhan+Sev2.jpg
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/...COCa89AJ#gid=0
As you can see here Uzbeks have 40 % Mongoloid admixture on average which is significant and makes them definitely not fully Caucasoid
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,687 Given: 1,192 |
Its a term invented before the use of admixture analysis and ergo thrown around somewhat wreck-lessy cause someone with 5% east Asian and 95% west Eurasian autosomal scores is probably not going to look the same as someone with the inverse of that. Yet the Coonian anthropologists simply latched on to the concept of any arbitrary amount of east+west eurasian traits = turanid.
yes, I know what you mean.
tr00ly.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks