If I can't be handsome, I feel I don't want to live anymore

[Ylla]

Oh bloody hell, here we go again.
RB I’d rather you post interesting content about your hobbies or travels, something like that.
Maybe get off social media as it’s clearly not doing you any good, spend your time more wisely, read some books, try new hobbies.
It just seems a bit ridiculous at this point, sorry.

[Universe]

I dont believe i opposed what anyone said.

I randomly replied to this thread , i put forward a simplified approach to something that these days so many people such as the Andrew Tate types and coaches as you mentioned seem to over complicate.

Richmond is an adult he can do whatever he wants why should it concern me , if anything at least his threads generate a lot of traffic for the forum.



I would not say being aware of Andrew Tate and coming across information about him is research. There are threads about him in this forum most people are aware of him and how he has made his money.

I'm a nice guy giving him advice (which he asked for) and trying to improve his life.

[Universe]

Yet I know tons of average looking men and women in happy marriages.

This number scale crap is only a problem for people who live on the internet. Some average Jane without an over-inflated ego is gonna be impressed by an average Joe who is nice to her, has a job, and appears to not have serious psychological issues. Humanity would die out if everyone was as crazy and shallow as people on the internet.

I don't see anything wrong with the numbers scale. Why is saying "average looking" better than saying "5/10 looking"? And why is saying "slightly above average looking" better than saying "7/10 looking"? The number scale is more simple, less words.

[tropicalslavic]

I don't see anything wrong with the numbers scale. Why is saying "average looking" better than saying "5/10 looking"? And why is saying "slightly above average looking" better than saying "7/10 looking"? The number scale is more simple, less words.

I try to be polite about how people look especially if it's something out of their control. I can't shake the feeling that it's slightly dehumanizing to reduce people to numbers on a scale. Even in threads where people are asked to rate someone, I will just say below average, average, above average. Something about the numbers scale just feels wrong. Plus it's just not objective.

[Anglo-Celtic]

I'm about to go all Vito Corleone on you. "Be a man (slap); be a man!"

[Petalpusher]

I don't see anything wrong with the numbers scale. Why is saying "average looking" better than saying "5/10 looking"? And why is saying "slightly above average looking" better than saying "7/10 looking"? The number scale is more simple, less words.

It's just a scale to convey a subjective rate of attractiveness online. In real nobody refers to people as numbers but we all naturally compute that in our mind somehow. Women just love to tone police everything. It's not about the message it's about how you say it and how it makes them feel or detract from the story telling about their nature.

[Jansob]

With people like RB there's a tendency to give more meaning to the numbers, and get obsessed with them. Tell him he's a 7 and he'll fixate on why he's not an 8 and how can he become an 8. Telling him his physical looks are above average is better.

[BakersfieldChimp]

I'm a nice guy giving him advice (which he asked for) and trying to improve his life.

He just dismisses most pragmatic advice outright.
Of course, that doesn't stop many of us from giving it to him.

If he asks the same questions over and over and over again.
We give him the same answers over and over and over again.

[Hektor12]

I just want get a wife /girlfriend.

A girlfriend/wife wants a man. But you dont sound like a man. You sound like a kid. No surprise you cant find a girlfriend/wife.

[rajputprincess]

A girlfriend/wife wants a man. But you dont sound like a man. You sound like a kid. No surprise you cant find a girlfriend/wife.

If he is a kid then adopt him