PDA

View Full Version : Uwe Boll's Auschwitz - trailer



Loki
11-13-2010, 09:22 PM
FS8E71RUOLU

German director's Holocaust film causes outrage (http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/nov/12/uwe-boll-auschwitz-film-causes-outrage)

Critics vow to boycott Uwe Boll's gruesome depiction of horrific crimes committed by Nazis at Auschwitz

A German film director best known for his adaptations of bloody video games has sparked widespread revulsion with his upcoming film about the horrors of the Holocaust.

Uwe Boll, who has been described as the world's worst film director and a "schlockmeister", said he felt it was time to present the Nazis' crimes in their "full horror" in his film Auschwitz.

His aim, he said, was to allow audiences to finally grasp the "real, everyday truth" of the Third Reich's atrocities.

Some critics have already vowed to boycott the film, having seen a gruesome teaser trailer – users must prove they are 18 before watching the clip on YouTube but even for adults it makes very grim viewing.

In the excerpt, the 45-year old filmmaker appears as an SS officer outside a gas chamber inside which prisoners are suffocating as they hammer in vain on the locked door.

Other scenes show prisoners being loaded into ovens and having their teeth pulled.

Critic Sophie Albers wrote in Stern magazine: "The words Auschwitz and Uwe Boll in one breath rightly leads one to fear the worst," adding that the film provoked "outrage, confusion and panic".

Tom Goldman, a critic with videogaming magazine the Escapist, said the film was "disturbing and gruesome" and was likely to push moviegoers "over the edge".

Forced on to the defensive even before a release date for the film has been set, Boll said in an interview with Die Welt it was "high time" to make a film which showed the "real Auschwitz".

He said that audiences had for too long been softened by "special story films" about the Holocaust "like Life is Beautiful or Schindler's List".

He said such films no longer had the ability to reach young people and that it was his duty as a German to make the film as a way of confronting the past.

"Every German is obliged to ensure that the Holocaust is not forgotten," he said.

"For a director like me who is known for his explicit depictions of violence, it's my duty to use precisely this talent to show people the atrocities of the Nazis."

Boll is best-known for video game adaptations such as BloodRayne and Alone in the Dark, as well as films about Vietnam, Darfur and 9/11, all of which have received very mixed reviews.

He once said he would stop making films if a million people signed a petition against him. An online version of the petition had more than 360,000 signatures today.

Boll told Stern: "Of course reality is unbearable, but we're talking here about something that was like an abattoir."

He said the killing scenes were "restricted" to 20 minutes, and that the rest of the film showed everyday life at the camp and included documentary footage.

Boll, whose most recent film Max Schmeling was about the boxer of that name, has submitted a rough cut of Auschwitz to the Berlin film festival, the Berlinale, and said he was waiting to hear if it had been accepted for the February 2011 event.

The film, which is currently in post-production, is due for general release early next year.

Boll compared his film to Alain Resnais's 1955 documentary Night and Fog.

"His film is also incredibly brutal but nevertheless it's the best film ever made about Auschwitz," he said.

Beorn
11-13-2010, 11:26 PM
I am actually looking forward to watching it. Don't get me wrong, I don't want to watch it to morbidly get off on it or anything so low as that, but for all the criticisms that the holocaust receives it sure is an interesting subject, and a moment in European history which (like it or not) is going to be a part of living memory for many years to come.

Eldritch
11-13-2010, 11:43 PM
I suspect the real reason for the "outrage" is that the whole carnivalization of the "Holocaust" thing is being done by a politically incorrect party this time.

Did somebody object to that pos by Tarantino, Inglorious Basterds, or whatever the spelling was?

And then again, how is this anything new:

http://www.silvamultimedia.com/Nazi/sexploitation/Ilsa_shewolfoftheSS.jpg

Holocaust porn is a very lucrative genre, with no need to pay for publicity. :thumbs up

Grumpy Cat
11-14-2010, 12:56 AM
It's raw and tells it like it is. Gruesome but educational. We should not censor these things.

Svanhild
11-14-2010, 01:05 AM
Another addition to the Holocaust industry (read Finkelstein) by a talentless and perverse director. Evil Germans the thousandth, new opium for the pathologically indignant masses. I don't care.

Guapo
11-14-2010, 01:20 AM
Seems like something Uwe is doing simply because he had some leftover sets from Bloodrayne. I heard Uwe had a relative who died at Auschwitz....he fell off a guard tower. Anyway, at least he isn't doing a movie about Hiroshima.

If you truly wants to learn about this horrible time then might I recommend watching what could be the greatest documentary on the holocaust, the 1986 "Shoah". It is 9 hours long but worth every second you devote to watching it.

Curtis24
11-14-2010, 01:33 AM
Hey, the more examination and discussion of this event, the better.

Osweo
11-14-2010, 02:13 AM
It's raw and tells it like it is.
I don't think that's even possible these days. Not only the immense political pressure, but also simple historical matters related with events a lifetime away.

Whatever is in the film - even if it was to some extent revisionist - it would remain a work of fiction, relying heavily on imagination and the subjective decisions of the producers.

Now when do we get to see close up and in details the workings of the CheKa or something about the Cultural Revolution? What's the word for this problem....? Selectivity?

Curtis24
11-14-2010, 02:47 AM
Whatever is in the film - even if it was to some extent revisionist - it would remain a work of fiction, relying heavily on imagination and the subjective decisions of the producers.

Be that as it may, it will at least foster some sort of more flexible, independent-minded discussion of the Holocaust.

Grumpy Cat
11-14-2010, 05:12 AM
Wrong thread please delete this post mods lol

Magister Eckhart
11-14-2010, 06:15 AM
I probably won't watch it for the same reason I wasn't interested in seeing The Passion; exact graphic depictions of violence for purely the feeling of "real historical accuracy" doesn't really appeal to me. It's really just meaningless blood-thirst after a certain point; to go and watch that sort of thing for entertainment--any form of entertainment, seems to be sadistic in its voyeurism.

I might add that I find it ironic that one can neither question the historical accuracy of the genocide nor, apparently portray that historical accuracy. It seems a bit hypocritical to me.

SwordoftheVistula
11-14-2010, 07:38 AM
This will provide a gold mine of video clips to set skinhead & nsbm music to on youtube

Grumpy Cat
11-14-2010, 02:46 PM
This will provide a gold mine of video clips to set skinhead & nsbm music to on youtube

LOL. Yeah right up there with that American History X curb stomp scene.

Peasant
11-14-2010, 02:49 PM
Uwe Boll's films are usually crap. He is going to be like a jew lamb to the slaughter when the critics see this one.

Eldritch
11-14-2010, 02:58 PM
Uwe Boll's films are usually crap. He is going to be like a jew lamb to the slaughter when the critics see this one.

He doesn't care what critics say. Everyone expects his films to be crap, that's the whole point of watching an Uwe Böll film now. Remember when he challenged any film critic that didn't like his work to a boxing match? :wink

Peasant
11-14-2010, 02:59 PM
I know, but a holocaust film? The man is mental.

Cato
11-14-2010, 03:05 PM
I know, but a holocaust film? The man is mental.

Or desperate since all of his other movies are stinkers.

Eldritch
11-14-2010, 03:09 PM
Or desperate since all of his other movies are stinkers.

That's the usual strategy when you're a filmmaker who's out of ideas, career stagnating, and/or in need of more recognition as a serious auteur. :coffee:

Cato
11-14-2010, 03:14 PM
That's the usual strategy when you're a filmmaker who's out of ideas, career stagnating, and/or in need of more recognition as a serious auteur. :coffee:

Boll has never been a serious filmmaker. He's a talentless amateur who can make movies because he's self-financed.