Do you think it is moral for one man to have many concubines if he supports them financially?

[Bobby Martnen]

As a way to have dozens of children, and if he can support them and give them good lives.

[Oneeye]

As long as he has time and money to spend on them.

[Bobby Martnen]

As long as he has time and money to spend on them.

95% of modern Western women would take a selfish, rich, jerk with a huge cock over a nice man of modest means with an average penis.

[Oneeye]

95% of modern Western women would take a selfish, rich, jerk with a huge cock over a nice man of modest means with an average penis.

Be honest, so would you.

[Bobby Martnen]

Be honest, so would you.

I'm not gay, bro

[Oneeye]

I'm not gay, bro

Why not?

[Bobby Martnen]

Why not?

Because I'm not attracted to penii, testicles, or men

[Oneeye]

Because I'm not attracted to penii, testicles, or men


But what if they're uncircumcised?

[Bobby Martnen]

But what if they're uncircumcised?

I'm anti-circumcision for reasons of bodily integrity and human rights, not because I have some sort of sexual desire for foreskins.

[Oneeye]

I'm anti-circumcision for reasons of bodily integrity and human rights, not because I have some sort of sexual desire for foreskins.

Do you appreciate the aesthetics of "bodily integrity"?

[Bobby Martnen]

Do you appreciate the aesthetics of "bodily integrity"?

I'm not sexually attracted to penises. I wish I'd been able to decide for myself if I wanted half of my dick chopped off, thus I advocate for preventing parents from chopping half of their son's dick off.

It's not a fetish thing at all, dude.

[Oneeye]

I'm not sexually attracted to penises. I wish I'd been able to decide for myself if I wanted half of my dick chopped off, thus I advocate for preventing parents from chopping half of their son's dick off.

It's not a fetish thing at all, dude.


Half of your dick was foreskin?

[Bobby Martnen]

Half of your dick was foreskin?

The foreskin is half of the penile skin, and approximately 70% of the penile sensitivity.

[Mary]

Sure. But no man is going to do it.

[Bobby Martnen]

Sure. But no man is going to do it.

I hate sex, but I'd love to have a lot of concubines, so I could have dozens or hundreds of children

[Oneeye]

The foreskin is half of the penile skin, and approximately 70% of the penile sensitivity.

I doubt that, but you're the foreskin advocate.

[Óttar]

Yes, but I also believe women should be able to do the same. People should be able to make any arrangement that works for them.

[rein]

Why not?

Op is such a homophobe and a heterophobe at the same time.

[Selurong]

As a way to have dozens of children, and if he can support them and give them good lives.

It's immoral. There would be a gender imbalance. There will be a lot of harem females and wifeless males, the former would be in sexual slavery while the latter would tend to be in crime.

[rein]

It's immoral. There would be a gender imbalance. There will be a lot of harem females and wifeless males, the former would be in sexual slavery while the latter would tend to be in crime.

That’s just the incel theory.

[Selurong]

That’s just the incel theory.

That's no Incel theory. It's history. Societies collapsed into barbaric states once they abandoned monogamy for polygamy. Monogamy allowed every man to start a family, leading to less competition and less crime and higher birthrates. Polygamy lead to lower birthrates since so few males are paired with a larger pool of females, leading to some females not having children at all vis-a-vis a monogamous society which had higher fertility rates. I know my shit, I studied demographic patterns in the Philippines and back when some of us where practicing Muslims our birthrates were low but when we became Christian and monogamous, birth rates increased, which was a strange pattern considering how sexually deranged Muslim men are with their harems and sex-slaves, but it turns out a higher ratio of paired males with females produced more children in total than some one dude with a lot of concubines fighting against all those sex starved forced bachelors.

[Bobby Martnen]

It's immoral. There would be a gender imbalance. There will be a lot of harem females and wifeless males, the former would be in sexual slavery while the latter would tend to be in crime.

Most females would love to be in a harem. Do nothing all day, fuck your master a couple times a month and live in luxury.

[Selurong]

Most females would love to be in a harem. Do nothing all day, fuck your master a couple times a month and live in luxury.

And then they complain if they're objectified...

Sent from my CHM-U01 using Tapatalk

[Bogdan]

Yes, in the way you said specifically though. No abandonment, leaving the women to manage finances, or trashy behavior. Purely to honor fertility, European tradition, and produce as many children as possible. It would be better if people were to have monogamous relationships with many children but I wouldn’t be against this if it were guided.

[The Lawspeaker]

Not at all. Marriage vows are marriage vows.