Ideology and Racial Differences?

[Mortimer]

There are differences across "races" of course and obviously but there is a broad spectrum of human diversity, inter-ethnic, or national differences, by origin, by religion, and also biological differences between individuals, like obviously "height" or "body type" endomorph, ectomorph, exomorph. Overall its 99.99% universally since always even in imperialism times accepted that all humans are the same species, and that all are humans, so the differences are rather minimal compared to the commonalities. Its a false evil ideology to claim differences based on race, nowadays its unheard of anymore, but back then people justified slavery based on race, like that certain races like negroes are 3/4 of a human and they made the argument "with differences between races".

[jakob]

I think you answered your own question.

[Smeagol]

[Blondie]

If you think there are no significant differences between races then visit Congo and after that visit Japan.

[Mortimer]

If you think there are no significant differences between races then visit Congo and after that visit Japan.

I dont know how correct that it is to attribute economical differences or differences in development Index of countries all "due to race" only

[Smeagol]

It's no coincidence that only Caucasoids and Mongoloids have been capable of building societies that people actually want to live in.

[Mortimer]

It's no coincidence that only Caucasoids and Mongoloids have been capable of building societies that people actually want to live in.

I think there were some african empires in ancient times, too, im not well familiar with it but heard about it, just that people do not really know it, they think africa is all mudhuts and naked people

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_empires

[Smeagol]

I think there were some african empires in ancient times, too, im not well familiar with it but heard about it, just that people do not really know it, they think africa is all mudhuts and naked people

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_empires

Apart from relatively late Semitic influence...the civilizations of Africa are the civilizations of the Hamites, its history is the record of these peoples and of their interaction with the two other African stocks, the Negro and the Bushmen, whether this influence was exerted by highly civilized Egyptians or by such wider pastoralists as are represented at the present day by the Beja and Somali....The incoming Hamites were pastoral Caucasians – arriving wave after wave – better armed as well as quicker witted than the dark agricultural Negroes.
(Races of Africa by C.G. Seligman)

[Lioncourt]

It's more climate and environment than race, like temperate vs tropical climate. Pakistan and Laos are more like Nigeria than like Germany and Japan.

[Mortimer]

Apart from relatively late Semitic influence...the civilizations of Africa are the civilizations of the Hamites, its history is the record of these peoples and of their interaction with the two other African stocks, the Negro and the Bushmen, whether this influence was exerted by highly civilized Egyptians or by such wider pastoralists as are represented at the present day by the Beja and Somali....The incoming Hamites were pastoral Caucasians – arriving wave after wave – better armed as well as quicker witted than the dark agricultural Negroes.
(Races of Africa by C.G. Seligman)

Sounds as if this man C.G. Seligman is a old white supremacist, just think logical that it is ideologically and bias driven to claim on one hand its not african if there is a small semitic influence on the other hand enslaving totally white looking children for having "one drop of negroe blood" and claim all of them are "negroes" that is totally only ideologically driven and so wrong

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Childr...the_plantation