3
Thumbs Up |
Received: 10,084 Given: 12,316 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 12,460 Given: 31,639 |
wow, ratio was 17 to 1 back then, but it's 4 to 1 now, still unexpected I'd say
Thumbs Up |
Received: 18,568 Given: 13,239 |
We were basically animals, so it makes sense.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 96 Given: 420 |
I'd imagine size and appearance played a significant role. Maybe a greater disparity in heights too due to variable nutrition?
Thumbs Up |
Received: 9,523 Given: 5,747 |
That's pretty much the stats of dating apps, 5-10% deemed attractive. So we ll probably beat those figures in the forseeable future. In a way that made us better, as men, even if a lot had to pay the price.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 11,283 Given: 13,636 |
Golddigging even back then.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,311 Given: 4,599 |
Those people who think old times were good times, they would be VERY surprised had they traveled to those times.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 926 Given: 308 |
I'd wager there was a lot of rape and bride selling going on back then. Huge thing in early Indo-European culture.
Just saying.
Women might (sometimes rightfully, sometimes not) be picky, but people weren't exactly living in modern societies with a lot of free choice back then lol.
It's Modelo Negra time
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,219 Given: 3,040 |
Neolithic Y-chromosome bottleneck is probably caused by wars between clans (members of clans had similar Y chromosomes)
Thumbs Up |
Received: 263 Given: 163 |
It probably has to do with wars or geneocide,since in the rest of history in general the difference,although it existed,was minimal or was no more than 1-2 1-3
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks