0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 10,426 Given: 4,139 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,654 Given: 661 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,654 Given: 661 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 10,426 Given: 4,139 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,654 Given: 661 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 10,426 Given: 4,139 |
You're som eastern European that's poor and that's why you're so salty. Keep trying to cope, but your genetics are overall closest to Moldovans with some Finno-urgic admixture. That's what your genetics say. You can't debate in a proper manner so you result to insults when we both damn well know that by genetics you're eastern European and by looks you'd be most common in EE although you look like some nordic with turanid/ uralic admixture. You don't look Austrian like you'd dream of and you're miles away genetically from Austrians. You wish you had my results since you're wannabe western and I'm a lot more western than you;
Spoiler!
And no asshole, just because west German is the closest single population, doesn't mean that it shows I'm identical to Germans;
6 76.9% West_German + 23.1% Bulgarian @ 2.74
When reality is too hard to handle, you deny it.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,654 Given: 661 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,948 Given: 7,469 |
Maybe you should have read my previous post. I explained that part there. The reason most of the toponyms and hydronyms are Hungarian is because Hungarians ruled Transylvania for around a thousand years and founded most of the cities there. For example, Cluj-Napoca was founded in 1213, after the Hungarian conquest of the land. Btw; Maramureș, Mureș, and Timiș are Transylvanian counties of either Latin or Dacian origin. And they weren't renamed recently for nationalistic reasons.
How did Slavs become the majority in Dacia after the Dacians left if there is documented Roman migration to the region and the region was administered by the Romans with an agenda of trying to Romanize the land? We also have records of Roman deities like Glycon being worshiped in Romania during the Roman occupation period (centuries before Hungarians came).
What year do you think Romanians migrated to Romania from the southern Balkans? The author of Gesta Hungarorum is clearly aware of their presence in the 1200's when he wrote that book.
Romanians are also mentioned in the 1300's in Universitas Vlachorum: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universitas_Valachorum
You want to ignore Gesta Hungarorum, which is fair, but there is also the Primary Chronicle written by Nestor a century before Gesta Hungarorum. It was compiled in 1113 and mentions the Romanians:
Keep in mind that this source is by a Slav and is just about the history of East Slavs. In case you don't know where the Dnieper River is, it is in Central Ukraine and Nestor is referring to the lands west of the Dnieper. The above text isn't exactly about Transylvania, but it shows that Vlachs (Romanians) lived that far up north before the Hungarians did. He's basically saying that Slavs were in western Ukraine first, but had been living side by side with the Vlachs until Hungarians came as invaders from the east and took land from the Vlachs. This isn't specifically about Transylvania, but it basically blows the whole "southern Balkan migration" nonsense out of the water. And since Nestor says that Vlachs weren't native to western Ukraine, he's implying they were from Romania/Dacia."The Magyars passed by Kiev over the hill now called Hungarian, and on arriving at the Dnieper, they pitched camp. They were nomads like the Polovians. Coming out of the east, they struggled across the great mountains, and began to fight against the neighboring Vlachs and Slavs. For the Slavs had settled their first, but the Vlachs had seized the territory of the Slavs. The Magyars subsequently expelled the Vlachs, took their land, and settled among the Slavs, whom they reduced to submission."
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,569 Given: 2,481 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks