0
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 40,076/2,221 Given: 10,740/944 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 3,357/218 Given: 7,733/443 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 40,076/2,221 Given: 10,740/944 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 3,362/198 Given: 5,351/287 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 546/55 Given: 362/2 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 3,362/198 Given: 5,351/287 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 23/0 Given: 0/0 |
It's very interesting to me, that even though Sicilians have one of the lowest (if not the lowest) levels of Atlantic/Baltic or any other classification of European DNA that is specifically not Mediteranian, yet you still wouldn't confuse any one of these pictures with anything but European white. It says something about the high levels of Caucasus/Middle Eastern in them...its white.
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 23/0 Given: 0/0 |
This could be total speculation here, but it seems to me that the within a population, the native sex tends to retain within the same sex gene pool. For example in Iberia, I think the men rather than the women tend to look more central European. We know that Iberia saw massive central european migration into Iberia, the Celts, and they basically replaced the original male gene pool, which is why the Y dna between Portugal, Spain, France, England and Ireland are similar.
In the case of North Africans, you say the women tend to look more European, well in history the opposite happened with the gene pool. The Barbary pirate slave trade displaced a few million women from Europe and the slave women were absorbed into the North African population. Curious you say the women look more European, after you know that.
There are currently 4 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 4 guests)
Bookmarks