The West Eurasian Calculator

[Abriekman]

Target: Abriekman_scaled
Distance: 2.7141% / 0.02714057
65.8 Baltic
31.2 Greek
3.0 Iberian

[Katarzyna]

Target: Katarzyna_AncestryDNA(real)
Distance: 2.7661% / 0.02766066 | ADC: 0.25x RC
75.6 Baltic
18.6 Iberian
5.8 Greek

[Lux Tenebras]

Distance: 2.7665% / 0.02766497
52.4 Greek
37.0 Baltic
10.6 Iberian

[Dušan]

Target: Dušan_scaled
Distance: 3.8265% / 0.03826489 | ADC: 0.25x RC
45.4 Baltic
43.0 Greek
11.6 Iberian

[Dušan]

Distance: 2.7665% / 0.02766497
52.4 Greek
37.0 Baltic
10.6 Iberian

Hi, are you ethnic Slovak?

[ScandinavianCelt]

Target: SC_Official_AveragedG25_Scaled
Distance: 1.8938% / 0.01893758
73.0 Nordic
18.2 Iberian
7.4 Greek
1.0 Indian
0.4 Amazigh

Target: SC_Official_AveragedG25_Scaled
Distance: 2.1528% / 0.02152836 | ADC: 1x RC
72.8 Nordic
27.2 Iberian

[Grace O'Malley]

Target: Grace_scaled
Distance: 2.3259% / 0.02325925
71.6 Nordic
28.4 Iberian

[tk'es]

Target: tk'es_scaled
Distance: 4.8709% / 0.04870926 | ADC: 0.25x RC
63.2 Caucasian
28.0 Nordic
4.2 Arabian
3.2 Greek
1.4 Indian


Target: tk'es_scaled
Distance: 4.9563% / 0.04956278 | ADC: 1x RC
65.4 Caucasian
26.6 Nordic
8.0 Greek



Distance to: tk'es_scaled
0.08186868 Caucasian
0.11074773 Iranian
0.12270149 Greek
0.15553276 Nordic
0.17257081 Iberian
0.17598005 Baltic
0.21975818 Arabian
0.28699675 Amazigh
0.35364640 Indian

[Eurafricanid]

Distance to: cass
0.04511878 Nordic
0.05992803 Baltic
0.09096869 Iberian
0.14197780 Greek
0.21384444 Caucasian
0.22888299 Iranian
0.27448209 Arabian
0.30154656 Amazigh
0.39801028 Indian


Target: cass
Distance: 2.1243% / 0.02124314
62.4 Baltic
28.6 Iberian
9.0 Greek


Target: cass
Distance: 4.4541% / 0.04454110 | ADC: 1x
98.8 Nordic
1.2 Iberian


A bit pointless

Target: German_Bavaria_Middle_Franconia
Distance: 0.9535% / 0.00953473
64.8 Nordic
23.0 Iberian
12.2 Greek


Target: Swedish
Distance: 1.5407% / 0.01540677
52.6 Nordic
25.8 Iberian
21.6 Baltic

But that's exactly what I expected to see, I wanted to destil the components onto their purest forms, that's why I used (mostly) ancient samples for that, we have:

Nordic: Highest Yamnaya, Higher WHG, Low EHG, Lower ANF.
Baltic: Highest EHG, Higher Yamnaya, Medium WHG, Low ANF.
Iberian: Highest WHG, Higher ANF, Medium Yamnaya, No EHG.
Greek: Highest ANF, Lower Yamnaya, No WHG, No EHG, lower Iran N, Lower Natufian, Lower (Non-Yamna) CHG.

The non-european ones are obvious, the Caucasian is high in CHG, the Iran is high in Iran N, the Arabian is high in Natufian, the Amazigh is high in Iberomaurusian, and the Indian is high in AASI.
BTW, all the other WANA components besides Arabian are very low in Natufian.

[cass]

But that's exactly what I expected to see, I wanted to destil the components onto their purest forms, that's why I used (mostly) ancient samples for that, we have:

Nordic: Highest Yamnaya, Higher WHG, Low EHG, Lower ANF.
Baltic: Highest EHG, Higher Yamnaya, Medium WHG, Low ANF.
Iberian: Highest WHG, Higher ANF, Medium Yamnaya, No EHG.
Greek: Highest ANF, Lower Yamnaya, No WHG, No EHG, lower Iran N, Lower Natufian, Lower (Non-Yamna) CHG.

The non-european ones are obvious, the Caucasian is high in CHG, the Iran is high in Iran N, the Arabian is high in Natufian, the Amazigh is high in Iberomaurusian, and the Indian is high in AASI.
BTW, all the other WANA components besides Arabian are very low in Natufian.

I don't really understand what you wanted to achieve? Is this supposed to be an anthropological or geographical model?
In both cases it makes absolutely no sense.