0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 58,465 Given: 59,297 |
I never said you keep repeating that lie, i was liberal (or a little liberal maybe not very liberal for american standards nowadays) but i indeed said "its a GOOD thing that queers have freedom and live how they want without being stoned like in some countries" thats what i said, you invented i was being sarcastic but actually want to stone queers, when i was not and said live and let live.
My AncestryDNA autosomal results [yes it is a link click on it]
Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you: Jesus Christ and the American Soldier. One died for your soul, the other for your freedom. Thank them both.
If I forget thee, O Jerusalem, may my right hand forget its skill, May my tongue cling to the roof of my mouth if I do not remember you, if I do not set Jerusalem above my highest joy. (Psalms 137:5)
[01-06, 03:14] frankhammer: The jewish folk have you by the balls.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 27,004 Given: 16,946 |
To rebuttal that point I might face legal consequences, you might can guess my opinion.
Regardless of a event in history and that number, whatever happened during these years was based on a homogenous society before the invention of mass media and disruption of society by our current economic system and dissolvement of family ties. Every collectivistic and ethnocentric effort by the German people will always be suppressed by arguing with the 3rd Reich. We now if we like it or not, live in a atomized society in west germany even more so than in east Germany. A logical consequence of capitalism.
The common ground of every German has to be Germanic ancestry, as its the link between every distant Germans to begin with.
There are Germans without much or any slavic,baltic,roman ancestry but there cannot be a German without Germanic ancestry.
This is simply the foundation of our house and you cannot have a sustainable structure without a foundation.
I am not sure if I dont understand your point, or I fail to make others understand my point.
Its inevitable that some of your and my ancestors had to fall under the nGna category, this land wasnt always inhabited by the same people, there always were large scale migration periods and periods of invasions.
To simplify, if the common ground is Germanic ancestry, and you and I are not fully Germanic, ancestors of our past had mixed with different ethnicities, people that fall under the nGna category.
What I think, your approach to what is defined as acceptable to be a German, exceeds even the Nürnberger Gesetze if I even understand your view correctly. I think if we draw the line of acceptable mixing within the border of autochthonous european populations, thats way more communicable and realistic. I dont even try to say such partnerships should be promoted.
But isolated from that, id support your pronatalist ideas, I just dont think you can achieve a positive birthrate under the frame of a liberal society. You need to go back to archaic family structures in order to achieve it.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,556 Given: 6,925 |
Most of it, however Hungarian, I’d consider nGa. So a potential parent of a German in the next generation. To me ethnicity is not a matter of choice but a matter of long grown and unquestionable conditions. Someone with 1/8 Hungarian and 7/8 German ancestry will not even have thoughts on his belonging while this - legitimately - is more fragile with 1/4 Hungarian, as you can assess yourself. There is no necessity that every individual is assigned to an ethnicity. It is normal in history that you permanently also have ethically intermediate individuals that (their descendants) depending on the development will become sorted in in an ethnicity in the next one or two generations. I have such ancestors as well. Maybe consider also this: When I consider someone a compatriot German he will be freed from any further questioning and his ancestry will be accepted as part of my identity as German. But this will also implicate claims on such an individual. What may be okay for a nGa can be an unexcusable treason by a G. So determining who is a G also includes the consideration if it’s justified to impose on someone the claims that are connected to a common ethnicity.
But I understand that I soon have to present an extensive display on that subject…
Target: rothaer_scaled
Distance: 1.0091% / 0.01009085
39.8 (Balto-)Slavic
39.0 Germanic
19.2 Celtic-like
1.8 Graeco-Roman
0.2 Finnic-like
Thumbs Up |
Received: 105 Given: 65 |
2 pure Ethnic French : Pavard, Rabiot
1 half-French half-Italian : Giroud
1 half-French half-Spaniard : Théo Hernandez
1 half-German (Yeniche I think) half-Portuguese : Griezmann
1 Gypsy : Jonathan Clauss
The other ones are not Euro : 1 of Filipino descent and the other ones are African people or mulattoes.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,551 Given: 192 |
Caucasoid part of Central Asia is not European of origin but Iranic. So they aren't Europeans in any means.
European-East Asian distinction is very clear, what is blurred is Caucasoid-Mongoloid distinction (Ural and Central Asia), Caucasoid-Negroid (Sahara) and Mongoloid-Negroid (Madagascar).
In Bulgaria, Bulgarian-Armenian mixes are not uncommon and if they have Bulgarian name, most people just take them as Bulgarians. In most mixes however the father is Armenian, so they have Armenian name and identify as Armenians ethnically.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 58,465 Given: 59,297 |
My AncestryDNA autosomal results [yes it is a link click on it]
Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you: Jesus Christ and the American Soldier. One died for your soul, the other for your freedom. Thank them both.
If I forget thee, O Jerusalem, may my right hand forget its skill, May my tongue cling to the roof of my mouth if I do not remember you, if I do not set Jerusalem above my highest joy. (Psalms 137:5)
[01-06, 03:14] frankhammer: The jewish folk have you by the balls.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7,618 Given: 7,807 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks